Who Do They Work For?

Who Do They Work For?

by Leon Howard

“Last week Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., a member of her party's leadership, said if there was no deal by January, her party would be willing to let all the tax cuts expire to pressure Republicans to give ground. Republicans immediately accused Democrats of being willing to raise taxes on everyone as the price for prevailing.”

After reading the preceding statement, my friend, Ethan, asked, “Who does she work for?” A pretty good question and is at the crux of the problem we have in this nation – A problem that has put us on the brink of disaster!

Who do they work for? If you listen to them, they work for us, we the People – But do they? I contend they do not work for We, the People; instead they have morphed into working for “the Party” and to hell with the People!

But if the Democrats work for their party doesn’t that mean they’re working for their fellow Democrats? And if the Republicans are working for their party doesn’t that mean they’re working for fellow Republicans? The short answer is NO!!

Both parties have morphed into their own power structure – The very thing our founding fathers warned us against! George Washington, in his Farewell Address, said, “All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual interests.

However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.

Towards the preservation of your government, and the permanency of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only that you steadily discountenance irregular oppositions to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretexts. One method of assault may be to effect, in the forms of the Constitution, alterations which will impair the energy of the system, and thus to undermine what cannot be directly overthrown.

….Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.”

Why didn’t we listen to President Washington? Why didn’t we listen to any of our founding fathers? Arrogance? Apathy? Stupidity? Ignorance? Probably all four of these but not in the way one would think.

The political parties are very guilty of arrogance and stupidity! The American People are guilty of apathy and ignorance, in a great part due to the arrogance and stupidity of the “Republicrats”! Through their arrogance and stupidity, they have violated one of the oldest truisms: “POWER CORRUPTS – ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY!”

We, the People, have allowed the Republicrats to create a ‘ruling class’ here in America and we allowed it through apathy and ignorance! ‘Politicians’ think themselves above the laws they write; in fact, they exempt themselves from the laws they create and treat the People as ‘the unwashed’, to be watched out for and watched over. They know they have created the Sheeple from the People! They pander to the ‘special interest’ groups, pay “lip-service” to our founding documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, and destroy the very documents they have sworn to uphold and defend against enemies foreign and domestic! They do this because the political parties have but one thought in mind: We must control it all! The political parties are the true enemies of liberty!

It doesn’t matter whether we are talking about the Republicans or the Democrats; their collective mindset is the same: Absolute control over the lives of the citizens and absolute control over the world! “That cannot be true!” You say. But it is! Oh, they use the nice words about ‘peace in our time’ or ‘this tyrant has to be stopped’ or ‘It’s in our national security interest’ but, in reality, they want to impose their brand of ‘freedom’ on the world.

Case in point: Remember when George W. Bush (the younger one) stated, “It is God’s mission for me to spread democracy throughout the world!” and attacked, without provocation, Iraq, and ‘freed’ the Iraqi people from the tyrant, Saddam Hussein? Oh, sure, he got the U.N. to pass a resolution authorizing the attack on “Weapons of Mass Destruction” but they never found any WMD’s – Bush and his administration yelled, “Bad intelligence!” Really? How about dishonest intelligence? How about planted intelligence by the neo-conservatives who believe the United States should be telling the entire world how to live?

Isn’t this just another case of not following the advice of our founding fathers? Remember, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and George Washington all warned against alliances with nations – Thomas Jefferson summed it up this way, "Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations — entangling alliances with none."

What Mr. Bush did is not a new tactic of the political parties, it has persisted throughout our history: Create and enemy, demonize that enemy with truth, half-truths, or fiction (Truth is ‘optional’ when creating an enemy), tell the lies often enough and the People will believe it, and, Voilà! you have a ‘new enemy’! An enemy the People will allow you to attack with impunity!

Case in point: President Andrew “Stonewall” Jackson, a Democrat, felt it was time to encourage the People to open the West for expansion; after all, President Thomas Jefferson had made the Louisiana Purchase from the French and, because of the Lewis & Clark Expedition, the West was a treasure trove of natural resources to be used by the new nation.

Up until Jackson, the nation followed Thomas Jefferson’s ploy for the Native Americans: Assimilation – By teaching the native tribes about the modern society of the time, many would abandon their old culture for the new. But the process was too slow for the expansion so, Jackson decided it would be much faster if he moved the native tribes onto reservations like cattle so they could be controlled. But, to accomplish this task, Jackson had to recreate them as the new enemy!

How did Jackson accomplish that? The native Americans were a very stoic people, not showing emotion when dealing with the ‘white man’ so – wait for it – That means they cannot cry so they must be savages and not completely human! Insane? Certainly but it proved effective and allowed the westward expansion without, first, settling with the tribes across the Mississippi and Missouri Rivers! First, Jackson rounded up, what was called: “the civilized tribes” – The 7 tribes of the Cherokee nation were moved from the southeastern United States to the Oklahoma Territory and promised that ‘the Great White Father’ would take care of them as he would his own children – Many Cherokees died on that forced march to Oklahoma called “The Trail of Tears”.

From that success, the expansion began and the settlers had to fight the tribes in their way across the country – A soon as a American family or wagon train was attacked, the government would send in the U.S. Cavalry; they would come to the rescue, subdue the warring tribe, make a treaty (the government never kept) and moved the tribes to ‘reservations’ and the West was settled. Justified? No, it was just faster! The political parties begin dismantling our founding documents by treating Native Americans as animals and not as equals! Jackson is credited with creating the modern Democrat Party.

Next case: President Abraham Lincoln, a Republican, and his “Radical Republican Congress wanted to “save the Union” and used the attack on Fort Sumter as the excuse to send the Army of the Potomac into the newly formed Confederate States of America. “But,” you say, “that war was fought to free the slaves.” Was it? If that is the case, why wasn’t mentioned as a factor in the beginning instead of over 2 years after the War Between the States began? Remember, the victors write the history books, so you will only find real history if you research it yourself! I am not here to defend the North or the South in this bloody conflict because there’s enough blame on both sides!

What made this conflict so detrimental to liberty; the first real attack on the Bill of Rights, was the fact it literally destroyed the 10^th Amendment, States Rights! And by gutting the 10^th Amendment, the political parties eliminated one of the built-in “checks & balances” to rein-in a central government from overreach!

During the war, Congress, again exceeded it’s Constitutional authority by authorizing the building of the Transcontinental Railroad, giving away, as a carrot, “government-owned” land … When did the U.S. government purchase any land west of the Mississippi? Where in the Constitution does it give the federal government any power to own land beyond that needed for Washington, D.C., forts, arsenals, and post offices? Until the War Between the States, the federal government owned no lands more than authorized by the Constitution – Other than the Louisiana Purchase and Seward’s Folly (Alaskan purchase), when did Congress ever spend any of the Treasury for additional lands?

Think “Andrew ‘Stonewall’ Jackson” and his ‘ethnic cleansing’ of native Americans off their lands and onto government reservations – The ‘radical Republican Congress’ stole the lands from the native Americans and gave it to the capitalists who risked their money to build the railroad! Not much ‘risk’ when you’re guaranteed thousands of acres that you spent no capital on – This was America’s first redistribution of wealth! By the Democrats? No, by the Republicans! But remember, this reformation of our Republic has been done and is being done by both political parties!

Next case: President McKinley, a Republican, and his Republican majority Congress used the sinking of the U.S.S. Maine as the main excuse to go to war against Spain; the battle cry: “Remember the Maine – To Hell with Spain!” To this day, we do not know why the Maine sank in Havana Harbor but it was America’s first entrance into the expansion of offshore territories; something our founding fathers would never have condoned. We “freed” Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines; acquiring Puerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines as territories. This was the nation’s first time meddling in other nation’s problems – Another thing our founding fathers warned against! Why didn’t we listen? The political parties make another change to the founders’ intent in international affairs!

Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican, successfully energized the GOP base as a highly visible campaigner to reelect President William McKinley on a platform of high tariffs, the gold standard, imperialism, prosperity at home and victory abroad. He assumed the mantle of President with the assassination of William McKinley and attempted to move the Republican Party (GOP) toward Progressivism, including trust busting and increased regulation of businesses. Roosevelt coined the phrase "Square Deal" to describe his domestic agenda, emphasizing that the average citizen would get a fair share under his policies. Scholars consistently rate him as one of our greatest Presidents but then, most ‘scholars’ are of a socialist/communist bent anyway. The fact Teddy Roosevelt was an Imperialist and a ‘progressive’ puts him on plane with Karl Marx; besides the fact this man repeatedly said he couldn’t understand why he had to follow the Constitution does not endear him to any lover of liberty! Teddy Roosevelt represents the political parties further intervention in free enterprise (picking winners & losers) and the real beginning of corruption of our government!

Next comes President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat, and with the assistance of both major parties, signed the 16^th and 17^th Amendments to the Constitution, plus enacted the Federal Reserve Act, creating an unconstitutional central bank! This President’s term in office will always be looked on as the main destruction of our Constitution’s “checks & balances” to maintain a small federal government! Both political parties made themselves more powerful than the People, whose contract with the government the Constitution is! With the 16^th Amendment, the Congress circumvents Article I, Section 2, Paragraph 3, to allow for direct taxation of personal income! This was not allowed when the Constitution was ratified. By enacting the 17^th Amendment, the political parties further destroyed the 10^th Amendment for States Rights by making the Senators a popular election position, instead of the Protector of States Interest – This has proven to be a further erosion of the Constitution and it’s envisioned small federal government!

Not to be outdone, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, a Democrat, used the Great Depression as an excuse to control business and spend tax money creating government jobs that do not last! After 8 years of this inane spending, his Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau Jr., stated, “We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work. I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises. I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started. … And an enormous debt to boot!”

Why didn’t FDR listen to him? Because he was doing exactly what he wanted: Redefine this nation to socialism and install himself as the Dictator … Why else would he propose a “new Bill of Rights” saying it was a ‘right’ to have a home and a job? Because if he had convinced the American People these ‘rights’ granted by a benevolent government were more substantial than our God-given rights, the Constitution would have been replaced! Why, even now, do both political parties speak of FDR as the best president of the last century?

Simple. By exaggerating FDR’s ‘success’ creating jobs and saving us from the depression, it gives the ‘record’ to create more government and more bureaucracy, robbing us of our own self-reliance and, over time, our God-given liberties! Most economists will tell you that FDR’s spending policies exacerbated and extended the Great Depression by 8 years!

Another thing both parties learned during this time period was: “Never let an emergency go to waste!” Just what does that mean? During an emergency, the sheeple will accept more restrictions on their liberties and more intrusiveness by the government! It allows them the ‘grow’ the government and bureaucracy at an accelerated pace; thus making the sheeple more dependent on government for their basic subsistence.

Luckily for the nation, FDR didn’t live through his 4^th term and, at the end of WWII, the Congress woke up to the real threat of a man like FDR becoming “President for Life” (a dictator) and passed the 22^nd Amendment to the Constitution, not allowing more than 2 terms as President.

The government continued to grow after WWII, even though we had Presidents warning us – Dwight D. Eisenhower, a Republican, warned the American People to guard against the “military industrial complex”; John F. Kennedy, A Democrat, warned us not to look to government for a safety net when he uttered his famous quote: “Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country!” Ronald Reagan, a Republican, warned us: “If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a nation gone under!” “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.” We are at that crossroad today: I don’t think we passed it on to our kids so we have got to educate them but our challenge is to pass freedom on to our grandchildren or it will be gone! But, again, we fail to listen! Or is it we failed to hear? – We failed!

Along comes President Lyndon B. Johnson, a Democrat, and with the help of both parties, declared War on Poverty, creating the “Welfare State” and we have spent the better part of 47 years trying to make the system function – It doesn’t and it never can! It was sold to us as helping our fellow man but, in reality, it created a greater dependence on government – The intention all along by both parties. It created the New Plantations for black Americans, with the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Rev. Wright preaching “victimism”! We are over 3 generations in dependency and the poverty level (number of people on welfare) is higher in numbers and slightly higher in percentage than before this “War” was started!

The one lesson we should learn from this social experiment is: “The poor will always be with us!” And the only thing we can do is get government out of the way so the entrepreneur can create a ‘better mousetrap’ without interference – If we can learn that, those who want to succeed will have the opportunity to do so and the ‘slugs’ will exist, barely, and it is not our fault!

On with the exposure of the treachery of both political parties because it continues!

The next villain to liberty was George H.W. Bush (the 1^st Bush) whose administration used lies to get our troops into the first Gulf War, called “Desert Storm” – Why were we there? In reality, we were there for big oil – Our government is still trying to pick the winners and losers! But they used stories of rape and savagery in the hospitals to win the American People over to “saving” Kuwait from Saddam Hussein.

At the end of that incursion, Bush announced his real agenda when he said, “This is the beginning of the ‘New World Order’!” Really? What’s that? Something the ‘progressives’ have been trying to establish since Teddy Roosevelt: One World Government with the President being the Supreme Ruler of the world! Bush furthered his agenda when signed he the “1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development”, approving the United Nations “Agenda 21”, which calls for the world-wide reduction in human population of 85%! Our Senate would not approve this treaty and it was set up so they didn’t need a treaty to implement – It is being implemented by our regulatory agencies; specifically, the EPA and the Dept. of the Interior!

Those first implementations were by Executive Order to the Environmental Protection Agency by then President Bill Clinton! President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, had a Republican Congress, with Newt Gingrich as Speaker of the House. Why didn’t the Republicans rescind this Executive Order? Once again, both parties participate in the calculated demise of our Republic because they feel they’re smarter than us, wiser than us, and know what’s best for us – They aren’t smarter or wiser and they don’t know better but that is the mindset of the elitist progressive! In their mind, we are truly “sheeple” rather than the People!

I have already exposed the junior Bush’s steps to quash our liberties so I won’t go there again.

That brings us to the current President: Barack Hussein Obama, a Democrat, who began his term in office with an almost veto-proof Congress and by “hook or crook” (mostly crook) shoved socialized medicine down the throats of the American People, spent a $Trillion to “stimulate” the economy with government jobs! And just like the Great Depression, it didn’t work to stimulate the economy and it wasn’t meant to – He wanted the money spent to rack up the national debt; in fact, in his first year in office, he spent more than all preceding Presidents had since George Washington!

President Bush’s T.A.R.P. legislation in 2008, and Obama’s stimulus spending and the socialized medicine enraged the populace to rise up with the Tea Party movement in February, 2009, and changing a portion of the Congress in 2010, putting the brakes on the total socialization of the United States!

That brings us to this Pretender to the White House, Barack Hussein Obama! BOTH parties are complicit in this egregious “administration” even getting started! Article II, Section 1, ¶ 5 “No Person except a natural born citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen years a Resident within the United States.” Because Barack Hussein Obama is not a ‘natural born citizen’, he is not qualified to be President and the Republicans will not pursue it and have him removed from office! All this ‘to-do’ about where Mr. Obama was born is a distraction; a distraction from the truth! The truth is: It doesn’t matter where Obama was born, his father was a British Subject, a Citizen of Kenya, therefore, This pretender to the White House is not a ‘natural born citizen’ because the definition of a ‘Natural Born Citizen’ is: From the "Law of Nations" (1758): "The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.  As the society can not exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.  The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as a matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it.  THE COUNTRY OF THE FATHERS IS THEREFORE THAT OF THE CHILDREN." Now apply that to Obama's Father being a Kenyan.

Rep. John Bingham of Ohio, considered the father of the 14th  Amendment, confirms that understanding and the construction the framers used in regards to birthright and jurisdiction while speaking on civil rights of citizens in the House on March 9, 1866:
" ... I find no fault with the introductory clause [S 61 Bill], which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents (plural, meaning two) not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen..."

Bingham is also quoted saying in the Spring of 1868 some serious warnings:
"May God forbid that the future historian shall record of this day's proceedings, that by reason of the failure of the legislative power of the people to triumph over the usurpations of an apostate President, the fabric of American empire fell and perished from the earth!...I ask you to consider that we stand this day pleading for the violated majesty of the law, by the graves of half a million of martyred hero-patriots who made death beautiful by the sacrifice of themselves for their country, the Constitution and the laws, and who, by their sublime example, have taught us all to obey the law; that none are above the law..."

Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168
'At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents (plural) who were its citizens (plural), became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.  These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.  Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents.  As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.  For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts.  It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents (plural), within the jurisdiction, are themselves citizens.' "Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168.

U. S. v Wong Kim Ark (1898) , the court thoroughly discussed "natural born citizen," and Justice Gray quoted from Minor v. Happersett 
The cases importance is that it is the first case decided by the Supreme Court that attempts to explain the meaning of "natural born citizen" under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.  Natural born citizen is similar to the meaning of what a natural born subject is under Common Law in England and why the framers specifically included a grandfather clause (natural born Citizen OR a Citizen of the United States, at the time of adoption of this Constitution) as the founding fathers needed to grandfather clause themselves in, in order to be president because they were British subjects.  The holding in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark states that Wong Kim Ark is a native born citizen and NOT natural born.  If you look at the fact of Wong Kim Ark being born in San Francisco, CA, of foreign (Chinese) parents, therefore was not 'natural born'.

Perkins v. Elg's (1939) importance is that it actually gives examples of what a "natural born citizen" of the U.S. is; what a "citizen" of the U.S. is; and what a "native born citizen" of the U. S.
In this case, the U. S. Supreme Court decided the same as in prior case law that a "natural born citizen" is a person who is born of two U.S. citizen parents (plural) AND born in the mainland of U.S.
  Citizen: On cross appeals, the Court of Appeals affirmed the decree, 69 App.D.C. 175, 99 F.2d 408. Certiorari was granted, December 5, 1938, 305 U.S. 591, 59 S.Ct. 245, 83 L.Ed. --. First.-- On her birth in New York, the plaintiff became a citizen of the United States.  Civil Rights Act of 1866: Ms. Elg was found to be a "citizen" because she was born in the mainland USA (New York)
  Native Born citizen: This principle was clearly stated by Attorney General Edwards Pierrepont in his letter of advice to the Secretary of State Hamilton Fish, in Steinkauler's Case, 1875, 15 Op.Atty.Gen. 15. Steinkauler, a Prussian subject by birth, who emigrated to the United States in 1848 and was naturalized in 1854, and had a son who was born in St. Louis the following year. 4 years later Steinkauler returned to Germany taking this child and became domiciled at Weisbaden where they continuously resided. When the son reached 20 years of age the German Government called upon him to report for military duty but his father then requested intervention of the American Legation on the grounds that his son was a "native citizen of the United States". On reviewing the pertinent points in the case, including the Naturalization Treaty of 1868 with North Germany, 15 Stat. 615, the Attorney General reached the following conclusion: 'Young Steinkauler is a native-born American citizen. Mr. Steinkauler was found to be a "native born citizen" because he was born in the mainland USA (St. Louis)
  Natural Born Citizen: U. S. Supreme Court's Relevant Facts:  Miss Elg was born in Brooklyn, New York, on October 2, 1907.  Her parents, who were natives of Sweden, emigrated to the United States sometime prior to 1906 and her father was naturalized here in that year. In 1911, her mother took her to Sweden where she continued to reside until September 7, 1929. Her father went to Sweden in 1922 and has not since returned to the United States. In November, 1934, he made a statement before an American consul in Sweden that he had voluntarily expatriated himself for the reason that he did not desire to retain the status of an American citizen and wished to preserve his allegiance to Sweden. [Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325, 327 (1939).]
U. S. Supreme Court's Holding:  The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 57 S.Ct. 461, 81 L.Ed. 617, 108 A.L.R. 1000) declared Miss Elg 'to be a natural born citizen of the United States' (99 F.2d 414) and we think that the decree should include the Secretary of State as well as the other defendants. [Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325, 350 (1939).]

Rationale of the logic is as follows: The U. S. Supreme Court in 1939 held that Elg was a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN because she was born in Brooklyn, New York on October 2, 1907, her father was naturalized as a U.S. citizen in 1906 under the Naturalization Act of 1906, and her mother derived her US citizenship in 1907 under the Expatriation Act of 1907 (federal statute) as proof, and being that, Elg was born prior to the 19th Amendment, ratified on August 18, 1920, her status was still  tied to that of her husband.
Ms. Elg was found to be a "natural born citizen" because she was born in the mainland USA (New York) of TWO US citizen parents. (plural) 

This all clearly shows: That a person can be a "citizen" under the following circumstances:
1)  Person was born of one citizen parent (Obama), or
2)  Person was born in the US mainland ("anchor babies"), or
3)  Person was naturalized (like Arnold Schwarzenegger, who most know is not eligible for President).

To be a "natural born citizen" the person MUST be born in the US mainland of two US citizen parents. (plural) 
Obama is at best a citizen, but NOT a 'natural born citizen' even IF he was born in the State of Hawaii because he had only ONE U.S. citizen parent. (singular)

The obvious question is: “Why aren’t the Republicans challenging this obvious proof?” Do you think it’s because the “party bosses” don’t care about the Constitution? Or do you think they might want to run their own candidate who cannot qualify under the Constitution? My thought? I think both those questions will be answered in the affirmative! The Republican Party has been ignoring the Constitution since 1860, in part; the Democrat Party has been ignoring the Constitution since 1828, so the “party bosses” don’t care about the Constitution! And all the ‘talking heads’ and many “party bosses” are talking of Marco Rubio as Romney’s V.P. pick. Senator Rubio doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen because his parents didn’t become U.S. Citizens until 4 years after Marco was born in Florida – He’s closer than Obama because his parents did become U.S. Citizens and Barack’s father never tried to be a Citizen of the United States!

This is the current fight we are waging: Even though the Republicans control the House, the Democrats control the Senate so absolutely nothing has been repealed and many of our ‘progressive’ enemies are still in both houses of Congress and in both parties! Enemies like the Black ‘Progressive’ Caucus, John Boehner, John McCain, and Harry Reid to name just a few.

But there is hope! We replaced 86 House members in 2010, and, hopefully, we will replace a bunch more this November! Make no mistake, this is a fight within the Republican Party because the ‘progressives’ are still in control of the Republican “sheeples” and they tend to vote for whomever their ‘leadership’ blesses!

In my state of Washington, the State Party ‘leadership’ is called the “Bellevue Mafia” and is controlled by 2 politicians who haven’t held public office for 20 years but control the voting of what is termed the ‘lamestream’ Republicans. What amazes me is these folks cannot figure out why they cannot win major state offices but the grassroots can see what is wrong but have been unsuccessful in ousting the ‘old guard’! That is what it will take or we will continue toward the fiscal and moral cliff!

The Democrats in my state are at least as bad off: They don’t have county conventions – I guess they can’t make any changes or they are all sheeple – I gave up on them years ago because they have been controlled by the wet side of the state we call the “Left Coast”.

Again, both parties are complicit in the demise of our liberties and the American Dream. The American Dream used to be succeeding in business or at least having the opportunity to succeed or fail – Today, because of the regulations on business and labor, there is over 95% business failure so the Republicrats changed the American Dream to owning your own home and they are even destroying that with their ‘progressive’ agenda!

But after thinking about the opening paragraph, where Patty Murray is listed as “a member of her party’s leadership …. ” This is the same Patty Murray who has been voted the dumbest member of the Senate almost every year she’s been in the Senate! I will add this caveat: If Patty Murray is part of the Democrat’s ‘leadership’ then they should be renamed the “Dumocrats”!